A colleague today mentioned the newly-announced Edge Conference — an event covering “advanced web technologies for developers and browser vendors”. It’s organised in partnership between the Financial Times’ Labs group, Google, and Facebook.
I opened up the website and scanned through it, quite excited by the premise and the talk schedules. It was only when I scrolled down a little further that I saw this:
I had to go back and check a second time to be sure: 22 speakers, all male. Not a single woman (at the time of writing).
I can’t remember the last time I saw a single-day web conference with this many speakers, which only makes it worse. If they’d featured one woman alongside 21 male speakers, it would’ve been embarrassing. To feature none looks almost deliberate.
The lineup of speakers is brilliant — there’s some of the leading lights of the British web development scene on that list. But none of them are women. Are there no women out there worth a place amongst these 22 web technology experts?
I put this question to Andrew Betts, one of the event’s organisers. He wasn’t happy with my accusation that the conference’s speaker profile was “inexcusable”, though:
I pressed him, asking him if he really didn’t think they were any worthy female speakers to be found. He replied that my argument was a straw man, and that he wouldn’t be “debating” it further. I was massively disappointed (and haven’t heard back since, despite further requests for clarity).
Now, I’ve seen Andrew speak at events before and he’s very good — a talented developer, innovative thinker and all-round nice guy. I don’t for a minute think he’s sexist or deliberately curating an event which doesn’t include any female speakers. His refusal, though, to engage with my (and others‘) concerns about the representation that Edge Conference offers, is a big issue for me.
His comment about being “happy with our process” doesn’t cut it in 2013. I’ve seen excuses from other criticised conference organisers, saying that they couldn’t find any female developers, or the ones they asked didn’t want to speak, or that their specific niche just doesn’t have that many female developers — I don’t think it’s good enough any more.
I don’t know what their selection process was, but if it was me organising it, I would explicitly not be satisfied with a process that resulted in 100% male speakers. I would have stopped once we’d reached, say, 17 male out of 22 possible speakers (being pretty conservative, I think) and insisted that the remaining five (a cool 22% female representation) would have to be women.
And, if I’d genuinely been unable to find any women using my mysterious “process”, or all the ones I’d asked weren’t interested, or some freak event meant that any available woman was swept into a hurricane on the day of the conference and would be unable to attend, I would have added a note stating as much, prominently, underneath the pictures of 22 men, not leaving it to attendees to draw their own conclusions about my interest in encouraging equality at developer events.
I appreciate the hard work and often high costs that go into organising a conference. It’s perhaps unfairly easy to pick on developer-focussed events for being overly male in demographics, especially in an industry where female representation is particularly low. The Guardian’s own recent Scale Camp was poorly attended by women, both in terms of speakers and attendees — this stuff is hard.
But with the recent high-profile cancellation of a similar British web development conference with a similarly poor female representation (although only 15 speakers, not 22…), I honestly can’t fathom why anybody organising events in 2013 doesn’t have this stuff tattooed onto their frontal lobe. Look:
(editor’s note: it’s been pointed out that the age-related claims in the above tweet aren’t backed by any known data)
I don’t want to start a Twitter mob or cause a conference to be cancelled. But I do want to know why a well-intentioned group of developers and companies have managed to create an event stunning for its cheap price, its strong technical themes, and its hugely disappointing lack of the most basic diversity — and it won’t even acknowledge there’s a problem.
The Edge Conference tagline states that attendees will “debate what’s broken, and how we can fix it”. I have a suggestion for a topic.
Post-postscript: Andrew and team have posted an FAQ statement on the site after Andrew and I went for a coffee and a chat about this article and the conference. It clarifies a few things I raise here and confirms that the people behind EdgeConf aren’t sexist, women-hating misogynists (as I hope nobody seriously suspected) but perhaps made assumptions that others shared their viewpoints on speaker selection criteria. Anyone calling for boycotts and cancellations should read this first before engaging angry mob mode on Twitter.
Post-post-postscript (this is getting a bit silly now, isn’t it): There’ve been a few good articles now written in response to my blogpost here and the issue in general:
- Martin Belam wrote an emotive blogpost titled “One day my daughter will ask me how we tolerated this“. I was going to pick out a key quote to summarise but the whole thing is brilliant so just go over there and read it all.
- Kate Bowles wrote a good piece called “Nothing personal“, reflecting on the statement by EdgeConf and her experiences in the academic world with these issues.
- The Atlantic began a campaign kicked off by Rebecca Rosen calling for speakers on all-male conference rosters to “refuse to participate unless there are women on stage with you“. It’s a bold request and while I’m not sure boycotts are always the answer, emphasising that these things are as much about individual responsibility as they are about society-wide concerns is a good point to make.